현재 위치 - 인적 자원 플랫폼망 - 가정 서비스 - Situation and Policy Paper ""
Situation and Policy Paper ""

Situation and Policy Essay Sample "Selected"

Only by studying the situation and policies can we grasp the current situation and strive to achieve higher goals in life. Let me share with you a few situation and policy papers, I hope it will be helpful to you!

Abstract: The Internet, with its advantages of openness, transparency, and speed, has become an all-weather anti-corruption tool. sharp weapon, forming an important anti-corruption force. While the Internet has enriched anti-corruption methods, it also brings many challenges and risks. In recent years, Internet supervision has been developing vigorously. In the process of anti-corruption, illegal problems such as invasion of personal privacy, malicious slander, and online violence have emerged, which seriously restrict the effectiveness of Internet anti-corruption. Therefore, it is necessary to build an institutional environment for online anti-corruption, standardize and improve online anti-corruption through legal means, and give full play to the scientific nature, pertinence and effectiveness of online anti-corruption.

1. Overview of Internet Anti-Corruption

The so-called Internet anti-corruption is to use network technology and the social public opinion effect caused by it to supervise governing behavior and restrict power, so as to achieve effective prevention, A way to curb and punish corrupt behaviors is a new approach to the anti-corruption cause. In an essential sense, online anti-corruption integrates three aspects, namely the Internet, public opinion and governance capabilities. While the Internet absorbs public opinion and effectively integrates people's wisdom and opinions, it also provides a new platform and a new way of dialogue for those in power and policy makers, which can grasp people's psychology and social public opinion more clearly, rationally, and panoramicly, thus continuously Improve governance capabilities.

Internet anti-corruption relies on the distinctive characteristics of the Internet, which has accelerated the process of punishing corruption in our country to a certain extent. Online anti-corruption has formed a deterrent force for corrupt elements, strengthened the authority of legal and disciplinary supervision, and opened up a new channel for my country's anti-corruption struggle; in addition, online public opinion is an effective complement to the lack of anti-corruption supervision by specialized agencies and mainstream media. Together with "network supervision", it constitutes a benign social "pressure reducing valve" and "stabilizer" that alleviates social conflicts in today's society.

2. Problems with online anti-corruption

However, online anti-corruption is a double-edged sword. Although online anti-corruption has achieved remarkable results, it has made unique contributions to my country’s anti-corruption struggle. Contribution, but as an emerging anti-corruption situation, online anti-corruption is still in its infancy in our country, and there are still some problems and deficiencies that need to be continuously improved and perfected in practice.

Freedom of information release and lack of sense of responsibility coexist, making it difficult to distinguish true from false information on the Internet

As a virtual public space, the Internet allows the public to hide their true identity. Publish information and express opinions freely without logging in with your real name. Due to the uneven quality of netizens and the lack of sense of responsibility. This makes the information complex, mixed, and difficult to distinguish between true and false. There are even problems such as infringement of personal privacy, public publication of rumors, venting of dissatisfaction, deliberate false accusations and slander, and leaking secrets that affect the investigation of cases. This has weakened the actual effect of online anti-corruption to a certain extent. .

2. The tendency of online violence is difficult to control, and the spirit of fighting against corruption undermines the effectiveness of anti-corruption

At present, most people do not have a strong awareness of the legal system of the Internet, and the management department cannot always punish various information publishers. Effective monitoring. Whether intentionally or unintentionally, once anti-corruption public opinion is incited online, it will form a huge force. This force not only points to the parties involved, but also puts great pressure on the government and society. If this trend continues to expand and move from virtual networks to real life, it will directly manifest as riots and affect social stability. In addition, netizens publicize anti-corruption information and clues in a big way, which can easily lead to premature exposure of corruption information and alert the target of the report, so that the target of the report can prepare early and adopt methods such as destroying evidence, colluding in advance, and transferring property to deal with the investigation of the disciplinary inspection department and judicial organs. This This makes it difficult to investigate and handle the case, and puts the reporter in a passive position where liability for defamation is pursued, failing to achieve the original purpose of network supervision.

Three Internet anti-corruption has not yet become institutionalized

At present, Internet anti-corruption is highly accidental and one-sided. Many Internet anti-corruption cases are only relevant after the huge public opinion formed by netizens. The department's attention, and the initial focus of netizens' attention had a strong entertainment color, and corrupt officials were not sanctioned based on reliable facts or evidence. In addition, the response speed of relevant government departments to online public opinion is obviously lagging behind, which may lead to the fact that corrupt officials who are punished according to law are only "a drop in the ocean." Therefore, online anti-corruption must be institutionalized and normalized so that it can form a long-term mechanism and fully exert its functions.

3. Improvement of the online anti-corruption system

The General Secretary pointed out at the Second Plenary Session of the 18th Central Commission for Discipline Inspection that it is necessary to continue to comprehensively strengthen the construction of the punishment and prevention system and strengthen the exercise of power. The restriction and supervision put power in the cage of the system, forming a punishment mechanism that dare not be corrupted, a preventive mechanism that cannot be corrupted, and a guarantee mechanism that is not easy to be corrupted. As an extension and expansion of public opinion supervision, online anti-corruption cannot be separated from the backing of physical systems.

The institutionalization of online anti-corruption needs to start from the following aspects:

First, improve the relevant legal provisions on online anti-corruption so that online anti-corruption can move towards legalization. Looking at my country's national legislation and regulations in the field of online anti-corruption, none of them involve measures such as the protection of online whistleblowers, government information disclosure and online anti-corruption. Our country's legislative body should promptly formulate and implement a series of laws and regulations related to online anti-corruption such as the "Online Anti-Corruption Law" and "Tort Liability Law", strengthen the construction of the legal system for online anti-corruption, clarify the legal responsibilities of all parties involved in online anti-corruption, and make the Internet Anti-corruption can achieve more substantial results.

Second, improve the online reporting system and promote the standardization of online anti-corruption. Due to the lack of a sound system and clear regulations for online supervision, problems such as "human flesh search" infringing on personal privacy rights and private online anti-corruption being separated from the official anti-corruption series have also arisen. There is an urgent need to improve the online supervision and reporting system. First, we must strengthen the legal construction of network supervision and improve the level of legalization of network anti-corruption; second, we must establish an incentive system for network supervision, and identify and reward individuals or organizations that actively use the network to carry out power supervision, participate in network anti-corruption and make positive contributions; third, The purpose is to establish an online supervision and reporting cooperation system, promote the effective docking and full cooperation between "official anti-corruption" and "private anti-corruption", and establish an official-civilian anti-corruption information communication mechanism. The fourth is to establish a supervision system for online supervision and reporting. Those who maliciously create false information, spread rumors, slander and frame others, as well as suppress, attack and retaliate against online supervision and reporting must be severely punished and sanctioned in accordance with the law.

Third, build an institutionalized and normalized online anti-corruption platform. At present, there are private online anti-corruption websites and official online anti-corruption websites in our country. Although private online anti-corruption websites are developing rapidly, they lack legal protection. Although official online anti-corruption websites have relevant legislation, they suffer from inefficient use. In view of this, we should reasonably integrate the two types of network resources, clarify their respective rights and obligations through legislation, and standardize the operating order of online anti-corruption platforms; we should also strengthen cooperation between the two to improve the visibility of online anti-corruption information. quality, enhance the standardization and institutionalization of online anti-corruption, and realize the complementary advantages of the two.

Fourth, improve the public opinion monitoring and guidance system and improve the ideological and moral quality of netizens. First, we must improve the online public opinion monitoring system, set up a special online public opinion supervision department, actively discover and extract valuable anti-corruption information, do a good job in investigating and handling corruption cases that are of concern to the public, and effectively resolve the occurrence of adverse public opinion incidents; second, we must improve the Internet The public opinion guidance system widely publicizes relevant laws and regulations, encourages the public to establish online moral awareness and strengthen legal concepts, guides the public to reflect problems objectively, look at problems calmly, and analyze problems comprehensively through the Internet, and guides the public to express opinions on the Internet in accordance with the law and rationally. speech to make Internet supervision more rational and standardized; third, we must improve the moral education system for netizens. We should adopt various forms to carry out ideological and moral education for netizens so that citizens can improve their awareness of self-discipline, abide by moral norms, and consciously resist Internet rumors, Internet hype, and Internet Violence and other bad phenomena, respect facts, release information and speech objectively and impartially, and create a good online cultural environment.

Fifth, improve information disclosure and information disclosure mechanisms. As the Internet continues to become more popular, the government should actively use modern science and technology to expand platforms for communication with the people and understand public sentiment and public opinion in a timely manner. At the same time, government departments and their staff must actively accept people's supervision; pay full attention to the opinions of netizens, control the spread of false information, provide timely and detailed public feedback on the progress of investigations into online anti-corruption incidents, express the government's attitude and handling methods, and eliminate people's concerns. Unreasonable suspicion and improve the effectiveness of online anti-corruption.

;